U.S. Soccer Press Releases: Labor Negotiation
The following includes the public statements and press releases made by U.S. Soccer.
Jan. 15, 2005
The following includes the public statements and press releases made by U.S. Soccer. January 13, 2005: Players Association Refuses Mediation Offer PLAYERS ASSOCIATION REFUSES U.S. SOCCER’S MEDIATION OFFER Union Rejects 2005 No-Strike Provision CHICAGO (January 13, 2005) — U.S. Soccer’s offer to go to independent mediation to resolve the current labor dispute with the U.S. Men’s National Team Players Association (USMNTPA), if the union agreed to a no-strike provision throughout the remainder of World Cup qualifying, has been rejected by the USMNTPA. Had the proposal been accepted, U.S. Soccer would have immediately called the U.S. Men’s National Team into training camp to prepare for the opening match in the final round of the FIFA World Cup qualifying scheduled for February 9 in Trinidad. Statement from U.S. Soccer President Dr. S. Robert Contiguglia: No new negotiations are scheduled with the players association at this time. If a collective bargaining agreement is not reached by February 1, U.S. Soccer will field a team of alternate players to participate in the match. As of today, U.S. Soccer has begun calling alternate players into a training camp scheduled to begin as soon as possible at The Home Depot Center in Carson, Calif. PLAYERS ASSOCIATION REJECTS BINDING ARBITRATION CHICAGO (January 10, 2005) — The U.S. Soccer Federation, the national governing body for soccer in the United States, has been notified by the U.S. Men’s National Team Players Association that they have rejected U.S. Soccer’s proposal for binding arbitration to resolve the current labor dispute. Had the proposal been accepted, U.S. Soccer would have immediately called the U.S. National Men’s Team into Training Camp to prepare for the opening match in the final round of the FIFA World Cup qualifying scheduled for February 9 in Trinidad. The binding arbitration proposed by U.S. Soccer called for each party to submit one final proposal (which for the Players Association could have been their most recent proposal or an adjusted proposal). Following those submissions, an arbiter would have selected a single proposal in its entirety. Statement from U.S. Soccer President Dr. S. Robert Contiguglia: U.S. Soccer’s previous proposals have offered a substantial increase in total compensation (38 percent in comparison to the previous term), but after two years of negotiations the union is still demanding a 108 percent raise (in comparison to the previous term) – more than double its current wages.
| .. |
Links: |

