|
|
| Scenario |
|
A White player is dribbling/shielding the ball near the far touchline. Red #12 comes over to challenge and is called for a foul. Consider that Red #12 disagrees with the decision. What is the correct decision by the referee?
|
|
 |
|
|
| Results |
|
11.0%
|
Free Kick to White, ignore Red |
67.0%
|
Caution Red #12 for Dissent |
|
20.0%
|
Talk to Red #12 and try to calm him down |
|
|
|
|
| Reason |
|
In this example you are asked to view this action to be an example of Dissent.
A caution should be given to #12 for Dissent (public, visual dissent) and the game restarted with a Free Kick to the White team where the original foul took place.
|
|
|
|
|
| Explanation |
|
- 2005/06 LOTG, Law 12, see "Cautionable Offenses," #2. (pg. 26)
- 2005/06 LOTG, Law 12, "Decisions of the International Board," Decision #1 (pg. 27)
- 2004 Q & A, Law 5, #6
- 2005/06 LOTG, Law 12, "Cautionable Offenses."
- 2005/06 LOTG, "Additional Instructions to Referees, AR's and 4th Officials" pg. 63 "Attitude towards Referees."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you know?