SEND-OFF AFTER THE GAME HAS BEEN RESTARTED?
It is my understanding that if the referee wants to caution or eject player he/she must do so before the restart of play. If team restarts play quickly, referee must whistle right away to stop action and give appropriate card. In Sunday's world cup final why was a card given to Zidane after play had restarted for a while after a handball by Del Pierro. Not trying to write that Zidane's action didn't merit an ejection but in my opinion the game had been restarted for too long for the referee to stop the game because of "injury" to Italian player and . Then Italian goalkeeper runs for 40 yds to referee to bring to his attention Zidane's action, then referee consults all his assistants then give card to Zidane. This appears to be a violation of the laws of the game, same as issuing three yellow cards in one game.
Here is the chain of events:
- he blows the whistle at 17:57 of the OT and points for a French free kick (del Piero had just gone down on the ball and touched it with his arm). you can hear the whistle and there really is no other interpretation of what he called or signaled. at this point, the ball is probably 16 yards from midfield, slightly closer to the side of the field where the main camera is.
- at 18:00, he again signals in the direction of a French free kick and the ball is placed down by the French player with his hands and kicked to another French player standing right at midfield on the edge of the center circle furthest away from the side of the field where the main camera is.
- at 18:04, he blows the whistle to stop play for the injury and heads downfield to tend to the injured player.
- at 21:18, after giving the card, he returns to the edge of the center circle just on the Italian side of midfield and gives a drop ball. and, to the extent there was any doubt, the ball is dropped to Italy, who then play it back to France since they were in possession when play was stopped.
Answer (July 212, 2006):
While it may have seemed slightly irregular to send off Zidane after play had restarted following his violent conduct, it was perfectly correct. The referee is bound to caution or send off a player prior to the restart only if he or she has seen or been made aware of the incident prior to that restart. If the referee chooses to allow the restart after having seen the infringement, then nothing further can be done about it other than noting it in the match report. If, as in the case of Zidane's violent conduct, the referee does not learn of it from one of the ARs or the fourth official until after the restart, then the referee may punish the misconduct as soon as he or she learns of it. There is no referee error here.
"DIVING" AND PERSISTENT INFRINGEMENT
An assessor asks: The other day I assessed a PDL match. The visiting team went up 2-0 in the second half. Frustration popped here and there but nothing serious. My concern was drawn by the activity of the visiting team taking advantage of the situation with several dives by different players. These guys were good and the referee was talking to them however it continued with different team members.
Is there anything in the Federation's teachings to deal with continual dives taking by different players on the same team? I am thinking of something like persistent fouls by different members on the same team against a member of the other team.
If I were the referee, I would start issuing yellow cards until the cows came home or they stopped. But that's really not the answering I am looking for.
Let me know the proper way to deal with this issue if there is one.
Answer (July 5, 2006):
If players are diving, then they should be punished. That doesn't necessarily mean that they have to be cautioned immediately for unsporting behavior for their simulation; they can be left there, flopping around, until the referee has the opportunity to deal with it. If they are out of the game temporarily then their team suffers from one fewer player and will find it more difficult to play.
Persistent infringement of the Laws refers to violations of Law 12--and not for offside, second touch, illegal throw-in, etc. Certainly these players can be punished for persistent infringement for their serial misconduct, because the Law doesn't specify that the infringement be a foul. The question is "why" the referee would apply the persistent infringement model to a continued pattern of simulation/dives without already having given the specified caution for unsporting behavior.
GOALKEEPER FORWARD MOVEMENT AT PENALTY KICK
I've noticed that the referees at the World Cup during the taking of kicks from the penalty mark used to break a tie don't seem to be enforcing the rule "the defending goalkeeper: remains on his goal line, facing the kicker, between the goal posts until the kick has been taken."
In almost every instance of this at the World Cup the goal keepers have been moving forward just prior to the ball being struck. Why is this being allowed? Why aren't the teams affected protesting?
Answer (July 5, 2006):
In point of fact, the goalkeepers at World Cup 2006 have been much better about staying on their goal lines and any infringements have been exceedingly minor.
Referees are expected to enforce this aspect of the Law the same way they are supposed to enforce ALL the Laws of the Game--with a minimum of stoppages and only when the violation clearly made a difference. The World Cup is not, after all, schoolboy soccer.
REFEREE FORGETS CARDS
Does US Soccer mandate the usage of cards for players in order to sanction a player? In other words....let's say the entire referee team does not have any cards with them at that particular game and the referee wants to either caution or send off a player . Can this only be done is using cards, or can they send the player by simply telling them to leave the field?
I realize that the LOTG are pretty clear..... caution and show the yellow card/send off and show the red card. But what happens if you don't have any cards (for whatever reason) with you? Does this negate the ability to sanction a player? Granted, this shouldn't happen. Someone on the ref team should have cards....but.....
Answer (June 30, 2006):
While the Law may require cards, if the referee was so forgetful (and the ARs, too) as to bring cards, they should make do with a simple verbal notification. It would be best to then pass the information on to both captains--who may or may not remember to tell their coaches.
An alternative might be to create "cards" when it is discovered that no one brought any--two pieces of paper with "YELLOW" handwritten on one and "RED" written on the other.
Of course, if no one brought cards, perhaps no one brought paper, pens, pencils, whistles, etc. (Perhaps they had better check to see if they are wearing shorts.)
PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING CARDS
We have been instructed to adhere to the procedure
I have noticed that in the world cup, the referees have followed Isolate, Issue Card, Book. Is the USSF still asking/requiring referees to follow the former?
Players usually know the card is coming. By asking them to remain in close proximity while you book seems to only frustrate them further. Then, you run the risk of losing your composure and would be tempted to issue a second for dissent when the player walks away (I have never done this , but have seen refs carry that chip on their shoulder for the rest of the game.)
Not a major part of the game, but any clarification would be appreciated.
Answer (June 29, 2006):
The correct procedure for giving cards is found in the USSF publication "Guide to Procedures for Referees, Assistant Referees and Fourth Officials":
The referee does the following things:
- Makes clear verbally and/or by pointing to the whistle that play may not be restarted except by the referee's signal
- Quickly identifies and begins moving toward offending player while beckoning the player to approach
- Attempts to draw offending player away from teammates and opponents
- Discourages others from approaching, interfering or participating
- Stops a reasonable distance away from offending player and begins recording necessary information
- States clearly and concisely that the player is being cautioned or sent from the field and displays the appropriate card by holding it straight overhead
- If the player is being sent off, delays the restart of play until the player has left the field entirely
- In situations where the event or conduct being penalized includes the potential for retaliation or further misconduct, immediately moves to the location of the misconduct and displays the appropriate card before recording any information
A benefit of following this guidance is to help the referee ensure that no mistake has been made in the procedure, such as forgetting that a player has already been cautioned.
FOUL OR NOT?
LAW 12 states: A direct free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following six offences in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:
- kicks or attempts to kick an opponent
Two players are attempting to win a 50/50 ball ( no player has control of the ball ). Player A reaches the ball just in time to clear the ball, however kicks Player B in the knee cap with his followthrough swing. Is this a violation of LAW 12?
Answer (June 26, 2006):
Was the act careless on the part of the "kicker"? If so, then it is a foul. If it was simply a case of follow through after making contact with the ball and clearly NOT meant to harm the opponent, then there is no foul. In short, you had to be there.
OFFSIDE AT/AFTER CORNER KICKS
I am a young referee, but have been doing it for about 5 years now and just finished a center for a U-13 boys state championship. In the half time discussion I had some experienced ARs and we had a small situation about corner kicks that lead to another question.
Situation 1: The attacking team decides to take a short corner, placing two people over the ball. Both posts have defenders right on the goal line including the keeper who is in the net. The ball is played from offensive player A to player B at which point no one pulls off the line. Before Player A enters the field after taking the kick the ball is played back to him. He is clearly over the goal line, but he keeps the ball in play. Is he offsides seeing as how he is clearly behind the second to last defender, but it is on the goal line. I came to the conclusion to let it play with no offsides. Was this the proper decision?
Situation 2: The attacking team looks like they are going to do a short corner, but Player A leaves the area and enters the box, however, when he leaves he gives the ball a slight nudge on the way by without anyone else noticing. Player B waits until the defenders have left him and follow Player A into the box then proceeds to dribble into the box unguarded. Is this a caution do to the play not being in "the spirit of the game" or is this something I should allow?
I am very interested to hear your response and I greatly appreciate your services, it is a big help to referees trying to improve and learn like myself. Thanks
Answer (June 26, 2006):
1. While no player can be offside directly from a corner kick, the same is not true as soon as any other player on the kicker's team plays the ball. Although the kicker had been off the field and the defenders did not leave the posts, the kicker should be declared offside when his teammate plays the ball back to him and he enters the field to play it.
2. If the ball has been moved even a short distance from "here" to "there," it is now in play. If there was a kicking motion this play is legal. It would not have been legal if the player simply tapped the top of the ball or brushed it with his foot--and did not move it from "here" to "there."
U.S. Soccer thanks Jim Allen (National Instructor Staff/National Assessor), assisted by Dan Heldman (National Instructor Staff), for their assistance in providing this service.
Submit your questions via e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.